Juliana Esti Blog's
  • Home
  • Download
  • Social
  • Features
    • Lifestyle
    • Sports Group
      • Category 1
      • Category 2
      • Category 3
      • Category 4
      • Category 5
    • Sub Menu 3
    • Sub Menu 4
  • Contact Us
         Good day Readers came back again on Juliana's blog in this time i'm going to share about SIMILE  please watch this video and hope this useful ....Thanks







    Then come to the other Video, in this Video all of you watch the different or comparison "Metaphor and Simile".. Have fun





 The last is the short explanation about "Simile", "Metaphor", and "Personification". I hope that will make all the Readers understand more about it.




Source:
https://youtu.be/uoSBVNUO2LU
https://youtu.be/oF9_fsUkxuk
 Hello my Beloved Readers,, came back again with me on Juliana's Blog. Now I'm going to Share with U all about Metaphor in SEMANTICS










What’s in a metaphor? 
According to Janet Martin Soscike’s working definition (1985) “metaphor is that figure of speech whereby we speak about one thing in terms which are seen to be suggestive of another.”
In common descriptions, a metaphor is seen as having two components: vehicle and tenor. In the above example from Quran, زَبَدًا رَّابِÙŠًا  is the vehicle being the main figure of speech utilized. The tenor, as clarified in the ayah itself, and confirmed by common tafaseer such Ma’ariful Quran, is Falsehood (actually, false beliefs).
In linguistics, the terms vehicle and tenor are replaced by ‘source’ and ‘target’, respectively. 
The commonality between the target (or tenor) and source (or vehicle) may be referred to as a ‘ground’.

Metaphor also have definition that is a form of figurative language in which one thing or idea is expressed in terms of another, is becoming an increasingly popular area of study, as it is relevant to the work of semanticists, pragmatists, discourse analysts and also those working at the interface of language and literature and in other disciplines such as philosophy and psychology. This book provides a summary, critique and comparison of the most important theories on how metaphors are used and understood, drawing on research from linguistics, psychology and other disciplines. In order to ground the discussion in actual language use, the book uses examples from discourse, including casual conversations, political speeches, literature, humor, religion and science. Written in a non-technical style, the book includes clear definitions, examples, discussion questions and a glossary, making it ideal for graduate-level seminars.


Source:
http://www.cambridge.org/cr/academic/subjects/languages-linguistics/semantics-and-pragmatics/metaphor
http://www.slideshare.net/sabrinaps/cognitive-semantics-metaphor
 https://structureofentropy.wordpress.com/category/by-contents/language-and-communication/





ADVERBIAL PHRASE
Submitted as One of Assignments of MorphoSyntax Course

Taught by Mustakim , M.Pd




 BY
 Group 2 :
1.     Juliana Esti   
2.     Siti Restian Ningsih  
3.     Juli Iskandar
4.     Manna Erika Sitompul

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITY OF LANCANG KUNING
PEKANBARU
APRIL 2016





CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of Study
            One of the branches in Linguistics is “Syntax”. Syntax is the science that study about how to arrange or construct the words (phrase) of Language to be well sentences which are accepted by the Native speaker. Syntax, moreover also encompasses systems and rules of Language, and those must be constructed according to frozen Language of English as conventional. Syntax, in this case, can be divided into two terms, that is: surface and deep structures. In Syntax, in addition to, to prove the sentence is well or not, must be performed and analyzed do not only throughout surfaces one, but also in deep structures (Seno, 2001).
Syntactic class is one having a distinctive functional potential; the words derived by a particular lexical process, however, will not be referred to by any rule of syntax (Huddleston, 1984:26). There are grouped into:
(1)   Words
Richards, et al (1985:1213) said that one or more sounds which can be spoken to represent an idea, object, action, etc. the smallest unit spoken language which has meaning and stand alone.
Spencer (1991:43), a word is the smallest that can exist its own.
So, based on theories above, word is a unit of language, consisting of one or more spoken sounds or their written representation, that functions as a principal carrier of meaning. One word can be consisted of one morpheme or more. A word that only has one morpheme is called by simple word. In other hand, a word that has more than one morpheme is called by complex word.

Examples:
Simple word: buy (one morpheme)
Complex word: unpredictable (three morphemes: un + predict + able).
Word also can be used to mention a word that can be seen by our eyes and not.
Examples: door, adore
(2)   Phrases
A phrase is a group of word which forms a grammatical unit, a phrase does not contains a finite verb and does not have a subject-predicate structure (Richard, 1985:39).
A phrase is a group of words that is missing a subject, a verb, or both (Reid, 2000:290)
Quirk, et al. (1985:60) said that the five formal categories of phrase are verb phrase, noun phrase, adjective phrase, adverb phrase, and preposition phrase.
a.       Verb phrase
Verb phrase minimally consists of a single verb followed by a noun phrase, adverb phrase, and prepositional phrase (Carnie, 2007:72).
Example: left quickly
V     Adv
b.      Adjective Phrase
Carnie (2007:68) said that adjective phrase consists of an adjective as head, optionally proceeded and followed by modifying elements.
Example: very  yellow
Adj     ajv
c.       Adverb Phrase
Carnie (2007:68) said that adverb phrase of an adverb as head, optionally proceeded and followed by modifying elements.
Example: very quickly
adv    adv





CHAPTER II
CONTENT

2.1 Definition of Adverbial Phrase
            Adverbial Phrase consists of one or more words. The adverb is head of the phrase and can appear alone or it can be modified by other words. The Adverb are one of the four major word classes, along with nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Adverbial phrases is group of word can consist of adverb with qualifier (too,very,so,enough,etc)
            In the example the adverbs phrase are in bold. The other words that modify the adverb are underline: We usually go on holiday in August, Time goes very quickly, The day passed quickly enough. This works really well for its size. In general, these patterns are similar to adjectives phrases.
            An adverb phrases can consists of one adverb plus other words before it (premodification) or after it (postmodification). Adverb phrases have many different meanings. There are kinds of adverb: adverb of time, manner, place, frequency, and purpose.
1.Adverb with Qualifier is adverb phrase that combine between adverb and qualifier and can fill the function adverb of manner.
Example
Contoh Kalimat Adverb Phrase
Adverb of Manner
Qualifier
slowly
extremely
He drives extremely slowly.
(Dia mengemudi dengan sangat lambat.)
quickly
enough
Every waitress should clean tables quickly enough.
(Setiap pelayan harus membersihkan meja-meja dengan cukup cepat.)



2. Prepositional Phrase
Adverb
Adverbial Phrase
Contoh Kalimat Adverbial Phrase
time
since yesterday, during the storm, before noon
They couldn’t do anything during the storm.
(Mereka tidak dapat melakukan apapun selama badai.)
manner
with his debit card, by bus
The customer always pays the bill with his debit card.
(Pelanggan tersebut selalu membayar tagihan dengan kartu debitnya.)
place
at home, in the classroom, to Bandung
I’m on a flight to Bandung.
(Saya sedang dalam penerbangan ke Bandung.)
frequency
every year
Old people may need to see a doctor every year.
(Orang-orang tua mungkin perlu mengunjungi dokter setiap tahun.)
purpose
for you
He bought this tiramisu cake for you.
(Dia membeli kue tiramisu ini untukmu.)

3.  Infinitive Phrase
Adverb Phrase
Contoh Kalimat Adverbial Phrase
to gain his muscle mass
He does physical exercises regularly to gain his muscle mass.
(Dia melakukan latihan-latihan fisik secara teratur untuk meningkatkan massa ototnya.)
to get the access
To get the accesss, you must register first.
(Untuk mendapat akses, kamu harus mendaftar dulu.)


2.2 Adverb Phrase (functions)
A. Adverb Phrase + Verbs
            We use adverb phrase most commonly to modify verbs. In the example the adverb phrase are in bold. The verbs that they modify are underlined.
Example: Children grow up really quickly
                I exercise very regularly and I eat quite healthily
B. Adverb Phrase + be
            We use adverb phrase with be. This is especially typical of adverb of place.
Example: I am upstairs. I will only be a minute.
               They are right there, on the table.
C. Adverb Phrase + Adjective or Adverb
            We use adverb phrase (Adv) to modify adjective and other adverb.
Example: I found it extremely difficult to talk to her
                                   (Adv)        (Adj)
               He drives really carefully
                               (Adv)    (Adv)
D. Adverb Phrase + Other Phrase
            We use adverb phrase (Adv) to modify noun phrase (Np) and prepositional phrase.
Example: That’s quite a tree. ( it’s a tree that is in special in some way, e.g. it’s very big)

                 We climbed right over the top of the hill and down again.
Well good day Ladies and Gentleman and My lovely Readers…came back again on Juliana’s blog. Now let me share you more and more about “Ambiguity” but please watch this video first and enjoy with the Explanation….




\

Kent Bach, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry
AMBIGUITY

A word, phrase, or sentence is ambiguous if it has more than one meaning. The word 'light', for example, can mean not very heavy or not very dark. Words like 'light', 'note', 'bear' and 'over' are lexically ambiguous. They induce ambiguity in phrases or sentences in which they occur, such as 'light suit' and 'The duchess can't bear children'. However, phrases and sentences can be ambiguous even if none of their constituents is. The phrase 'porcelain egg container' is structurally ambiguous, as is the sentence 'The police shot the rioters with guns'. Ambiguity can have both a lexical and a structural basis, as with sentences like 'I left her behind for you' and 'He saw her duck'.
The notion of ambiguity has philosophical applications. For example, identifying an ambiguity can aid in solving a philosophical problem. Suppose one wonders how two people can have the same idea, say of a unicorn. This can seem puzzling until one distinguishes 'idea' in the sense of a particular psychological occurrence, a mental representation, from 'idea' in the sense of an abstract, shareable concept. On the other hand, gratuitous claims of ambiguity can make for overly simple solutions. Accordingly, the question arises of how genuine ambiguities can be distinguished from spurious ones. Part of the answer consists in identifying phenomena with which ambiguity may be confused, such as vagueness, unclarity, inexplicitness and indexicality. 
1. Types of ambiguity
2. Ambiguity contrasted
3. Philosophical relevance
Well Ladies and Gentleman now the next explanation start from:
1. Types of ambiguity
Although people are sometimes said to be ambiguous in how they use language, ambiguity is, strictly speaking, a property of linguistic expressions. A word, phrase, or sentence is ambiguous if it has more than one meaning. Obviously this definition does not say what meanings are or what it is for an expression to have one (or more than one). For a particular language, this information is provided by a grammar, which systematically pairs forms with meanings, ambiguous forms with more than one meaning (see MEANING and SEMANTICS).
There are two types of ambiguity, lexical and structural. Lexical ambiguity is by far the more common. Everyday examples include nouns like 'chip', 'pen' and 'suit', verbs like 'call', 'draw' and 'run', and adjectives like 'deep', 'dry' and 'hard'. There are various tests for ambiguity. One test is having two unrelated antonyms, as with 'hard', which has both 'soft' and 'easy' as opposites. Another is the conjunction reduction test. Consider the sentence, 'The tailor pressed one suit in his shop and one in the municipal court'. Evidence that the word 'suit' (not to mention 'press') is ambiguous is provided by the anomaly of the 'crossed interpretation' of the sentence, on which 'suit' is used to refer to an article of clothing and 'one' to a legal action.
The above examples of ambiguity are each a case of one word with more than one meaning. However, it is not always clear when we have only one word. The verb 'desert' and the noun 'dessert', which sound the same but are spelled differently, count as distinct words (they are homonyms). So do the noun 'bear' and the verb 'bear', even though they not only sound the same but are spelled the same. These examples may be clear cases of homonymy, but what about the noun 'respect' and the verb 'respect' or the preposition 'over' and the adjective 'over'? Are the members of these pairs homonyms or different forms of the same word? There is no general consensus on how to draw the line between cases of one ambiguous word and cases of two homonyous words. Perhaps the difference is ultimately arbitrary.
2. Ambiguity contrasted
It is a platitude that what your words convey 'depends on what you mean'. This suggests that one can mean different things by what one says, but it says nothing about the variety of ways in which this is possible. Semantic ambiguity is one such way, but there are others: homonymy (mentioned above), vagueness, relativity, indexicality, nonliterality, indirection and inexplicitness. All these other phenomena illustrate something distinct from multiplicity of linguistic meaning.
An expression is vague if it admits of borderline cases (see VAGUENESS). Terms like 'bald', 'heavy' and 'old' are obvious examples, and their vagueness is explained by the fact that they apply to items on fuzzy regions of a scale. Terms that express cluster concepts, like 'intelligent', 'athletic' and 'just', are vague because their instances are determined by the application of several criteria, no one of which is decisive.
Relativity is illustrated by the words 'heavy' and 'old' (these are vague as well). Heavy people are lighter than nonheavy elephants, and old cats can are younger than some young people. A different sort of relativity occurs with sentences like 'Jane is finished' and 'John will be late'. Obviously one cannot be finished or late simpliciter but only finished with something or late for something. This does not show that the words 'finished' and 'late' are ambiguous (if they were, they would be ambiguous in as many ways as there are things one can be finished with or things one can be late for), but only that such a sentence is semantically underdeterminate--it must be used to mean more than what the sentence means.
Indexical terms, like 'you', 'here' and 'tomorrow', have fixed meaning but variable reference. For example, the meaning of the word 'tomorrow' does not change from one day to the next, though of course its reference does (see DEMONSTRATIVES AND INDEXICALS).
Nonliterality, indirection and inexplicitness are further ways in which what a speaker means is not uniquely determined by what his words mean (see SPEECH ACTS). They can give rise to unclarity in communication, as might happen with utterances of 'You're the icing on my cake', 'I wish you could sing longer and louder', and 'Nothing is on TV tonight'. These are not cases of linguistic ambiguity but can be confused with it because speakers are often said to be ambiguous.
3. Philosophical relevance
Philosophical distinctions can be obscured by unnoticed ambiguities. So it is important to identify terms that do doubtle duty. For example, there is a kind of ambiguity, often described as the 'act/object' or the 'process/product' ambiguity, exhibited by everyday terms like 'building', 'shot' and 'writing'. Confusions in philosophy of language and mind can result from overlooking this ambiguity in terms like 'inference', 'statement' and 'thought'. Another common philosophical ambiguity is the type/token distinction. Everyday terms like 'animal', 'book' and 'car' apply both to types and to instances (tokens) of those types. The same is true of linguistic terms like 'sentence', 'word' and 'letter' and to philosophically important terms like 'concept', 'event' and 'mental state' (see TYPE/TOKEN DISTINCTION).

SOURCE:
http://online.sfsu.edu/kbach/ambguity.html


Postingan Lebih Baru Postingan Lama Beranda

ABOUT ME

I could look back at my life and get a good story out of it. It's a picture of somebody trying to figure things out.

POPULAR POSTS

  • Branches of Discourse Analysis
  • PPT CHILDREN CENTERED LESSON
  • My Expert in Discourse Analysis

Advertisement

Follow us on Facebook

Formulir Kontak

Nama

Email *

Pesan *

Visitor

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Blog Archive

  • ►  2017 (4)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  Maret (2)
  • ▼  2016 (20)
    • ►  Oktober (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  Juni (4)
    • ►  Mei (4)
    • ▼  April (4)
      • What is SIMILE?
      • Metaphor
      • Adverbial Phrase
      • Explanation of Ambiguity
    • ►  Maret (4)
    • ►  Februari (1)

Translate

  • Beranda

About Me

Foto Saya
juli
Lihat profil lengkapku

Followers

Weekly most viewed

  • My Expert in Discourse Analysis
                        Assalamualaikum and Good Day for all my Readers and  followers In Indonesia start from Sabang until Marauke and E...
  • Symbol and Referent in Semantic
    Well Readers... This one of my Assignment for Semantics and i hope this Article can helpful. SYMBOL AND REFERENT THE NATURE O...
  • EUPHEMISM
    Hallo Readers……. came back again with Juliana blog’s. Now I’m going to share with all of you about “EUPHEMISM”. Hope can useful for all my...
  • The Challenge Change My Live
    Assalamualaikum and Hello for my Readers and  followers In Indonesia start from Sabang until Marauke and Especially around the WORL...
  • What is Proverb?
    Definition of Proverb                     Proverb is a brief, simple and popular saying, or a phrase that gives advice and effectivel...
  • Branches of Discourse Analysis
    Branches of Discourse Analysis 1.      Critical Discourse Analysis Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is the important thing, becau...
  • Lets Know The Polysemy
    Polysemy is the association of one word with two or more distinct meanings. A polyseme is a word or phrase with multiple meanings. ...
  • Homonyms,Homophones, and Homographs
    Homonyms, homophones and homographs can bring confusion to even adults and teachers! VocabularySpellingCity can help anyon...
  • Denotation,Connotation and Implication
    Good day everyone and All of My Readers,, came back again with me on Juliana Blog's. Now I'm going to explain and share more about ...
  • The Definition Discourse
    The Definition Discourse Discourse     Discourse is generally used to designate the forms of representation, codes, conventions...
  • Beranda

About Me


I could look back at my life and get a good story out of it. It's a picture of somebody trying to figure things out. Great things in business are never done by one person. They’re done by a team of people.

Popular Posts

  • Branches of Discourse Analysis
  • PPT CHILDREN CENTERED LESSON
  • My Expert in Discourse Analysis

Advertisement

Designed By OddThemes | Distributed By Blogger Templates